• Part of
    Ubiquity Network logo
    Join Mailing List Submit a book proposal

    Read Chapter
  • No readable formats available
  • Restoring Anarcho-Christian Activism: From Nietzsche’s Affirmation to Benjamin’s Violence

    Christos Iliopoulos

    Chapter from the book: Christoyannopoulos A. & Adams M. 2018. Essays in Anarchism and Religion: Volume II.

     Download

    This chapter approaches the issue of activism through the prism of the pacifism/violence debate within Christian anarchist circles. Based on two philosophical critiques – Friedrich Nietzsche’s critique of Christianity and Walter Benjamin’s critique of violence – I challenge the main anarcho-Christian theses that favour a pacifist/passive model of action, providing an alternative context for the interpretation of the relevant biblical passages and, ultimately, offering a restored version of anarcho-Christian activism, beyond dogmatic pacifism and fetishistic violence. The first critique looks at those Christian features that have turned Christianity into self-negation, and promotes an affirmative life stance. The second critique presents a qualitative approach to violence, distinguishing between two types – mythical and divine – out of which the latter revises the role of violence in Christian anarchist practices. Resistance to evil and secular authority can now acquire a new meaning, affirmative and active instead of passive and resentful.

    Chapter Metrics:

    How to cite this chapter
    Iliopoulos, C. 2018. Restoring Anarcho-Christian Activism: From Nietzsche’s Affirmation to Benjamin’s Violence. In: Christoyannopoulos A. & Adams M, Essays in Anarchism and Religion. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/bas.f
    License

    This is an Open Access chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (unless stated otherwise), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright is retained by the author(s).

    Peer Review Information

    This book has been peer reviewed. See our Peer Review Policies for more information.

    Additional Information

    Published on Sept. 26, 2018

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.16993/bas.f


    comments powered by Disqus