• Part of
    Ubiquity Network logo
    Join Mailing List Submit a book proposal

    Read Chapter
  • No readable formats available
  • Mediating Public Cultural Policy: Buildings, Bills, and Films as Governmentality

    Fredrik Krohn Andersson

    Chapter from the book: Petersson, S et al. 2018. The Power of the In-Between: Intermediality as a Tool for Aesthetic Analysis and Critical Reflection.

     Download

    This article examines how the supposedly new public cultural policy in Sweden during the 1960 and 1970s was mediated and materialized in a number of forms. The cultural policy encompassed both a contradiction between the emphasis on a broadened concept of culture and a more narrow understanding of cultural practices, as well as a conflict between elements of power and control in policymaking, and assertions on the necessarily free character of the cultural domain. Departing from three cases, in form of the government committee report Ny kulturpolitik 1972 and the government bill on cultural policy 1974, the building Kulturhuset in Stockholm 1974, and the information film Jämlikhet – för handikappade? 1973, an approach of governmentality is in conjunction with perspectives of inter- and transmediality implemented in order to analyze how the potentially inherent conflicts and contradictions of the cultural policy were enacted in these various mediated forms.

    Chapter Metrics:

    How to cite this chapter
    Krohn Andersson, F. 2018. Mediating Public Cultural Policy: Buildings, Bills, and Films as Governmentality. In: Petersson, S et al, The Power of the In-Between. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/baq.k
    License

    This is an Open Access chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (unless stated otherwise), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright is retained by the author(s).

    Peer Review Information

    This book has been peer reviewed. See our Peer Review Policies for more information.

    Additional Information

    Published on Sept. 27, 2018

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.16993/baq.k


    comments powered by Disqus